Property and pre-nuptial agreements
5th September, 2015
It may not sound romantic, but a pre-nuptial agreement may help save a lot of headaches about your home if the worst happens. Family law specialist Sarah Crilly outlines the reasons why.
The recent statistics tell us that nearly 50% of marriages end in divorce. On average, a marriage in Britain lasts only 11 years. For second marriages, these tend to end within the first 5 years.
Nearly two-thirds of those divorces now end with the family wealth evenly split between husband and wife. Equality has become the guiding principle for settlement, even more so where there are significant assets involved.
Property assets tend to form the majority of a couple’s greatest capital. Most tend to be acquired jointly and comprise the matrimonial home so an equal split of any equity may be the norm unless one party’s needs dictate there should be an unequal split.
However, if you are embarking on marriage for the first or even second time and have either inherited or been gifted property from family members or simply have acquired your own property portfolio before even meeting your spouse, consideration must be given to what you wish to happen if you later divorced.
Whilst these types of property would be classed as non-matrimonial assets, it does not give a party complete protection from attack within divorce.
Such assets are not automatically ring-fenced. The only way of affording yourself the greatest protection is to enter into a pre-nuptial agreement, which is a contract entered in to by a couple prior to marriage which sets out how they intend to regulate their financial positions in the event of a divorce.
Rather than leave the division to the court, a pre-nuptial agreement will give the parties certainty and is a sensible form of wealth protection.
It will also reduce legal fees as the issues for the court will be clearer and narrower. The average cost of ending a marriage through the courts is £13,100 and that tends to be the small asset cases.
Although not automatically binding on the court, provided it is entered in to fairly, both parties have had the opportunity to consult a lawyer before signing it and there is no injustice if the pre-nuptial agreement is followed, the Supreme Court has ruled that they should be upheld and only departed from in limited circumstances.
Pre-nuptial agreements benefit anyone with assets that need to be divided after a divorce. Of course, there are cases where one or both parties are in business and this can bring additional complexities to the case or their affairs may be tied up with a Trust or farm, but all couples can benefit from a pre-nuptial agreement.
Couples do end up in court on some of the most uncomplicated cases where they may just be arguing over the split of equity in a house.
They still have to fund the costs of the court proceedings and the stresses of litigation are exactly the same no matter how simple or complex their assets.
Please note that this briefing is designed to be informative, not advisory and represents our understanding of English law and practice as at the date indicated. We would always recommend that you should seek specific guidance on any particular legal issue.
This page may contain links that direct you to third party websites. We have no control over and are not responsible for the content, use by you or availability of those third party websites, for any products or services you buy through those sites or for the treatment of any personal information you provide to the third party.
Topics: